![]() Other than deploying the spell with a melee weapon attack instead of a melee touch attack, the magus spellstrike ability doesn’t change the normal rules for using touch spells in combat. "Can a magus use spellstrike to cast a touch spell, move, and make a melee attack with a weapon to deliver the touch spell, all in the same round? ![]() I found a way to do it by 15th level with spell perfection. ![]() I know, it's really cheesy, but I'm wondering what is the faster way of pulling this up. and the damage of the second touch spell added on top. This would, at level 5, give 3 attack (swift Arcane Mark, as a touch spell, gets me 1 free attack that Spellstrike let me do with my weapon, then fullattack for 1 attack because of BAB, then cast a spell, making it shocking grasp or any touch spell granting me another free attack, again made with spellstrike), one at max BAB, and 2 at BAB-2. As cantrips can be cast at will, I would be able to pull it off every round I do not use a swift action to do something else. If I could cast Arcane Mark (wich is a cantrip touch-spell) as a swift action, it is then the same as being able to make a swift action attack with my weapon. Now the reason why I want this it to use the maximum potential of the Spellstrike class feature.Ĭasting a touch spell grant a free touch attack, and this attack can be made with your weapon because of Spellstrike. But is there a way to make it faster then 15th level? I am aware that I could do it at 15th level, with Spell Perfection feat, use Quicken on it and just ignore the level adjustment of Quicken. I was wondering if, by using all Official (pulished by WotC and Paizo) material from D&D 3.5 and Pathfinder, there was a way to cast cantrip (namely Arcane Mark) as a swift/free action and STILL use a 0 lvl spell slot (aka no spell slot at all), while being a Magus (PF base class), preferably while being low level (about 5, but I'm open to suggestion that would work for any level).Īnybody think he can manage to find a way to do it?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |